The cost of doing nothing is real but hard to see, because it is paid in small amounts of time spread across many people. Put a number on it before you compare it with any fee. Three numbers are enough: the people who retype, chase or check work, the hours each spends on it a week, and what an hour of their time costs.
Hidden costs lose to visible ones
A fee is a single number on a proposal. The cost of the current way of working is scattered across timesheets, late nights and missed follow-ups, and nobody adds it up. So when an owner weighs a fix, the visible number usually wins, and the hidden one keeps being paid.
The owner’s own hours are the largest and least counted part. Owners and executives tell us about the evenings they and their most senior people spend holding the operation together. Those hours rarely appear in any budget.
Three people retyping 8 hours a week cost $48,000 a year
Illustration. Three people each spend eight hours a week retyping information between tools. At a loaded cost of $40 an hour, that is $960 a week, or $48,000 over 50 working weeks. The hourly figure is a middle estimate. US private employers paid $36.73 an hour worked, wages and benefits included, for office and administrative staff in June 2026, and $46.89 across all private-industry workers.1
Add the owner’s hours on chasing and checking, at whatever an hour of the owner’s time is worth, and the figure usually grows quickly.
Three numbers give an estimate in ten minutes
Step 1: Count the people
List everyone who retypes, chases or checks work that a system could hold. Include the owner.
Step 2: Estimate their hours
Ask each person, or estimate for them, how many hours a week the work takes. A rough figure is enough for now.
Step 3: Multiply by what an hour costs
Use a loaded hourly cost, wages plus benefits, and multiply by 50 working weeks.
The estimate does not need to be precise. An answer within 50% is enough to show whether a problem is worth a closer look.
A test you can run
If you won twice as many clients next quarter, how many more hours of retyping, chasing and checking would you pay for?
For five working days, ask everyone on the team to tally the minutes they spend retyping, chasing or checking work that a system could hold. Add the tallies, convert them to hours, and multiply by a loaded hourly cost and by 50 working weeks. Then double the figure for twice the clients. Keep both numbers. The first is the baseline any fix should be measured against; the second is what growth will cost if nothing changes.
Shredded Growth cut onboarding from an hour per client to seconds
Onboarding each new client used to take an hour of manual work. We automated the main onboarding process and built automated sub-processes around it. Onboarding a new client now takes seconds. That saving repeats with every client the company wins. You can read the full case study.
Where this is the wrong answer
If the work already sits on a timesheet against a client, use the timesheet instead of a tally. And if the estimate comes out small next to the other costs you are weighing, leave the process alone. A fix is worth pricing only when the hours it would remove are worth more than the attention it takes.
Sources
- 1
Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, June 2026 (Table 4: private industry workers by occupational group). US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2026.
Sample: National Compensation Survey: about 28,300 occupational observations from about 6,600 private-industry establishments
StrongWages plus benefits per hour worked, from a national probability survey. It is a US average across all company sizes and regions; use your own payroll figures where you have them.
- Strong
- Large or audited sample, published method, and a population close to owner-led companies.



